Persistent SI joint pain
Symptoms are chronic, functionally limiting, and clinically consistent with the SI joint as a meaningful pain generator.
Minimally invasive sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion is designed for carefully selected patients with chronic SI joint pain when the diagnosis is well supported and appropriate non-surgical treatment has not provided adequate improvement.
The SI joints connect the sacrum at the base of the spine to the pelvis. When an SI joint becomes a persistent pain generator, symptoms may be felt in the low back, buttock, or nearby regions.
Because SI joint symptoms can overlap with lumbar spine, hip, and other musculoskeletal conditions, diagnosis requires more than identifying where it hurts. History, examination, provocative maneuvers, imaging when appropriate, and response to diagnostic injection may all contribute to determining whether the SI joint is the likely pain generator.
SI joint fusion is not a first-line treatment for most low back or buttock pain. Careful diagnosis and appropriate patient selection are essential before considering fusion.
Symptoms are chronic, functionally limiting, and clinically consistent with the SI joint as a meaningful pain generator.
The history and physical examination, including a combination of SI joint provocative maneuvers, support the diagnosis.
Image-guided diagnostic injection may help confirm that the SI joint is contributing meaningfully to the patient’s symptoms.
Appropriate non-surgical care has not provided adequate improvement, and symptoms continue to interfere with meaningful activity or quality of life.
Using image guidance and a small surgical approach, implants are positioned across the SI joint to stabilize the joint and support fusion. The exact implant system, trajectory, and technique depend on the patient’s anatomy and the device being used.
The goal is not simply to treat pain in the general SI region. The procedure is intended for a well-supported SI joint diagnosis after other reasonable causes of symptoms have been considered.
Randomized trials comparing certain minimally invasive SI joint fusion systems with non-surgical management have reported improvements in pain, disability, and quality of life in selected patients, with benefits maintained in longer-term follow-up. However, the evidence is not uniform: a sham-controlled randomized trial did not demonstrate superiority over sham surgery at six months. These findings reinforce the importance of diagnosis, patient selection, informed expectations, and individualized decision-making.
Evaluation focuses on confirming the likely pain generator, reviewing prior care, examining relevant imaging, and determining whether diagnostic injection or additional evaluation is appropriate.
The SI joint is accessed through a minimally invasive approach, and implants are placed across the joint using image guidance. Procedure details vary by technique and implant system.
Recovery and activity progression are individualized. Follow-up focuses on healing, function, symptom response, and a gradual return toward appropriate activity.
Diagnosis is based on the overall clinical picture rather than any single finding. History, pain location, physical examination with provocative maneuvers, imaging when appropriate, and response to an image-guided diagnostic injection may all contribute to determining whether the SI joint is a meaningful pain generator.
No. Most patients with suspected SI joint pain are initially treated non-surgically. Fusion is considered only for carefully selected patients with a well-supported diagnosis and persistent, functionally limiting symptoms despite appropriate non-surgical treatment.
No. An SI joint injection may be used diagnostically and, in some situations, therapeutically. SI joint fusion is a different treatment approach that uses implants to stabilize the joint and support bony fusion.
No. Radiofrequency procedures target nerve signaling and do not fuse the SI joint. SI joint fusion uses implants to stabilize the joint and support fusion. They are fundamentally different treatment approaches.
Recovery varies based on the procedure, implant system, individual health factors, and clinical progress. Activity restrictions and rehabilitation recommendations are individualized, and return to normal activity typically occurs gradually as recovery progresses.
A focused evaluation can help determine whether the SI joint is a meaningful source of your symptoms and whether minimally invasive SI joint fusion may be an appropriate treatment option.
Request an AppointmentThis page provides general educational information and does not replace an individualized medical evaluation. SI joint fusion systems have device-specific indications, contraindications, risks, and instructions for use. Treatment recommendations, alternatives, and expectations should be reviewed as part of an individualized treatment discussion.